Sunday, 8 December 2019

Waiting is an opportunity, not a waste of time........


Before I started to paint, I used to do a lot of photography.
I loved my old Analogue SLR and together we shot
many, many photos. Alas, along comes digital cameras
and out went films and the need for labs. 
I bought myself a digital camera, but, I never warmed to it.
I started to paint instead.
Now, many years later, due to torn rotator cuffs and
bursitis in my neck and shoulders, I can no longer paint.
Alas, I have decided to go back to photography as it
does not hurt.
(The above image is a photo I shot in my kitchen an 
hour ago with my crappy, old, low pixel rate,
digital camera.)
Satisfying though it is to instantly be able to see the
image, I have to admit that I miss the waiting for
the ''reveal'' while waiting at the lab for photos
to be developed.
(Although, truth be told, I don't miss the cost involved
with having films processed.)
Waiting, come to think of it, is something many of 
us don't like very much.
Perhaps how we experience the passing of time may have
something to do with how we view waiting?
''Life is short, so I need to cram as much of it into every passing
moment as I can.''
This is of course where i-Thingy's come in handy.
Wherever/whenever we find ourselves having to wait, we can
always fill the time (make use of time) by ''surfing the net'',
listening to music, checking emails, catching up with friends,
etc.etc.
There is no doubt about how very handy it is
to be able to do those things, but lately, I have 
been wondering if it is not possible that we may
miss out on actual ''living experiences'' when we
forfeit it for ''virtual'' ones.

Waiting, for some of us, may feel like we are
''wasting'' our time, so we may feel a need to fill
 it with something we deem more useful.
But, often when we are waiting somewhere,
we are not doing so in a void. Usually, there
are others waiting as well.
At the doctors, in a queue, at the bus/train stop, at the airport,
etc.etc. 
These sorts of situations can be opportunities for
making new connections, for observing life
in the moment, for just ''being''.

According to those in the know, more and more of
us are feeling alienated and lonely.
And I can't help but wonder if our ''obsession'' and
preoccupation with i-Thingy's perhaps has something
to do with that.
If we replace face-to-face interaction with 
virtual interaction, there is some research that
suggest that rather than feeling closer to others,
we feel more isolated.
However, if we use social networking to promote
face-to-face conversations, then the outcome is often
that we feel less lonely.

An i-Thingy can perhaps feel like a ''security blanket'',
but consider this,
is it possible that it can also be viewed as a
''Do Not Disturb'' sign?
Next time you are waiting(for whatever),
why not keep your i-Thingy turned off
and just use your waiting time to 
observe everything around you.

''Life only happens in the Now.''

Sunday, 1 December 2019

Funny? Not if someone gets hurt............


 Charlie Chaplin, (above painting) once upon a time was a world
wide known movie star.
Through dark times during the Depression, World War I and II, 
he managed to find a way of allowing mankind some respite
from despair and heartache through his uncanny and wonderful
knack of making us laugh.
 What I find so masterful and insightful about his art is that 
he managed to (and still does) make us laugh at ourselves and all our
idiosyncrasies without any undertones of sarcasm or cynicism.

How often do you laugh?
What would you consider to be ''funny''?
Do you think there is a difference between laughing at verses
laughing with?
There is a theory that suggests that often what we find 
to be funny involves an element of surprise.
(We think we know what will happen next, but then something
else happens instead.)
There seem to be a general consensus that ''laughter is the
best medicine''.
Why?
Well, some say that:
it's good for our blood vessels, our emotional well-being,
it helps with social bonding, makes us more attractive,
lowers our stress and anxiety levels, strengthens our immune
and respiratory systems.

I read somewhere that laughter is about bonding/relationships
rather than a bunch of jokes.
Have you noticed that watching a ''funny'' something together
with others somehow makes it easier to laugh than when
you're on your own?
Actually, if you are sitting alone in a coffee shop, food court, etc.
reading a book, or watching something funny on your
i-Thingy and laughing out loud, 
I'm pretty sure that people will deem you a ''nutter''.
But if there were two of you looking at something,
meh, nothing weird at all.
In 1980, a movie by the title of ''The Gods Must Be Crazy'',
was released and much to the surprise of
critics, audiences world over loved it.
Synopsis: A Coca-Cola bottle dropped from an airplane
raises havoc among a tribe of peaceful African bushmen
who believe the bottle to be a utensil of the Gods.
There is very little talking through the movie,
just a lot of un-expected occurrences taking place,
occurrences that most folks regardless of nationality
 found to be hilarious.
(Including me)

Coming back to laughing with or laughing at, I find
that laughing at is very different from laughing with.
Laughing at often seem to me to be done at someone else's expense.
Laughing with on the other hand, seem to involve the sharing
with someone/others the many absurdities and inconsistencies 
that constitutes human behaviours.
What we may find ''funny'' changes as we age.
Farting is funny when you're 5 years old, embarrassing 
when your 17, uncouth when you're 35, bad form
when you're 54, but then funny again when you're 98. 
Ooopsie!!!
When I was a kid, I was made ''fun'' of for years by
others at school. 
I remember one thing in particular.
For some reason, it was cool to have a large
birthmark. During an inspection by the school nurse
we were stripped down to our underwear. The nurse would then
mark down who had what marks or freckles.
I had none. Nada, zilch, nothing.
So the ''new song'' the bullies chanted was:
''You're not even born, coz you have no mark of birth.''
Funny? Not so much.
Which is why I love much of Charlie Chaplin's
 work. Funny, without being sarcastic or demeaning.
Always infusing his comedy with intelligence,
reflection, and a meaningful message.
If in order to be funny a person feels he/she needs to
''lace'' his/her humor with sarcasm, shame, or criticism,
perhaps he/she may benefit from watching a few
Charlie Chaplin movies.........
and learn a trick or two from the Master.

''Research has shown that laughing for 2 minutes is just
as healthy as a 20 minute jog. So now I'm sitting in
the park laughing at all the joggers.'' (coolfunnyquotes)

about painting: large canvas, acrylic....


Monday, 25 November 2019

How do we know that we really know someone?


''I wish that for once he would actually hear me. 
Let his guard down, silence his inner critic, and
just listen. 
I would love it if for once in my life
 I was able to really get to
know him, him, not as my father,
but as a fellow human being.''
The young man lets out a sigh, starts his car, throws a quick 
glance in the rear-vision mirror, then begins his
long journey home.

What do we mean when we say that we know somebody?
At what point does it change from knowing things about
somebody to knowing somebody?
As far as I can ascertain, we can know a lot of things about
a lot of people without being able to say that we know them.
Such as:
 Knowing where and when they were born, what their
educational background is, what kind of food or music
they like, etc.etc.etc.
This kind of information may help us to form a basic
understanding of who we think someone may be,
but, without a personal connection or interaction
with that someone,
is it really possible for us to say
that we truly know that someone?
If we want to move from ''knowing about'' someone
to really ''knowing'' someone,
often this necessitates an accumulation 
of shared experiences.
However, shared experiences whether physical
and or emotional in nature, do not necessarily guarantee
that a deeper bond(knowing) will be forged, but potentially, it is
fertile soil in which a personal and deep connection
can spring forth and flourish.

If we really want to know someone, I believe that
we need to forfeit our own assumptions, 
wishes, and illusions about that someone
and instead focus our attention on what is 
actually presented to us.
Come to think of it, how many of us can say 
with certainty that we even know ourselves?

In my younger and more confusing days, many of us
were familiar with the term: ''He/she's left to
go and find him/herself.''
Folks would travel the world, sail the seven seas,
live like hermits in for-ever-reaching deep forests,
brave deserts, drink peyote tea, sweat with shamans,
whirl with the whirling dervishes, hum with
Buddhist monks, submit to silence in abbeys,
and this they would do in order to try to know
the core of who they are.
Often, after long journeys, whether inward or outward,
many of us would discover that to get to know
who we were, we didn't need to travel.
What was needed was to learn how to be still
and sensitive enough to hear our own inner voices.

Getting to know someone, in my view involves
us being willing to let our guard down, to share
intimate parts of ourselves as well as being
sensitive and open-minded toward others when
 or if, they choose to share intimate parts of themselves
with us.
For some of us, to open up and share things
about ourselves which we consider to be
very private, can be quite challenging.
Scary even. But why?
Vulnerability.
Being ''open'', we run the risk of being
hurt. The person we open up to may not
reciprocate, at worst, he/she may make fun
of what we just told him/her.
This happens. It has happened to me many times.
But, if we all clam up because we are afraid of
getting hurt, how can we ever establish friendships,
or any other kind of meaningful relationships?
''Be vulnerable: quake and shake in your boots
with it. The new goodness that is coming to you
in the form of people, situations, and things
can only come when you are vulnerable,
that is: open.'' (Stephen Russell)

''With the world as with people, you know only
the tiny percentage you pay close attention to.''
(Steve Touthonghi)

about the image: acrylic on canvas, altered in Photoshop

Monday, 18 November 2019

Who is the bogeyman? Facing the ''Shadow''......


The bogeyman.
Exactly who he is and where he comes from seem to
be somewhat mysterious.
But, as far as I can ascertain, he is scary.
Perhaps what makes him so scary is that no one seems to
really know what he looks like, where he comes from and what
he will do to us if he catches us.
Whatever he is and wherever he comes from, folklore tells us
to get as far away as possible from him.
The Scientific American suggests that the bogeyman can be viewed
 as a metaphor for something that to us represents fear, anxiety and danger.
Although known by other names such as: Krampus, jumbie, bhoot,
Baba Yaga, etc., variations of the bogeyman can be found
in many cultures.
Regardless under what name the bogeyman is known,
often he is used as a tool for keeping children in line, for
making them follow ''the rules'',
(whatever they may be according to cultural
ideals).
Although the bogeyman is a folklore, there seem to me to be 
a number of ''bogeymen'' hiding behind quite ordinary looking
facades.(Appearances)
Pleasant and polite at work>>>a tyrant at home
 Loyal and committed in words>>>devious and sneaky in action
Jovial when sober>>>violent when drunk
Loving husband/wife/partner before others eyes>>>
an abuser behind closed doors,
just to give a few examples.
Perhaps the potential for becoming a ''bogeyman'' is possible
for most of us human beings given certain circumstances?
War, for instance, in my view, seem to qualify as such a circumstance.
Atrocities are often carried out under the banner of
fighting the enemy, protecting one's country,
serving one's country, doing one's duty,
etc.etc.
Those in the know say that when we are faced with highly
stressful and threatening circumstances, how we
 respond during such times often affect our behaviour.
At times even to a degree that we respond in ways
that during normal circumstances we would classify as
un-acceptable.
When at war, peace-time values, ethics and morals are reevaluated.
A soldier is sanctioned to murder the enemy, although it is
no longer called murder, it's called killing.
A man/woman who kills 20 people in peace-time
 is called a mass-murderer, a soldier who kills 20 people
in combat is often called a ''hero''.
Whenever there is a war of any kind, it seems to me that
this is when seemingly ordinary folks can turn into bogeymen.
Which is a worry, because when the war is over, where do
they all disappear to?

Perhaps the Bogeyman is what Carl Jung calls the Shadow?
According to Jung the shadow represents the dark side
of our personality that our consciousness doesn't want
to acknowledge.
''Everyone carries a shadow, and the less it is embodied in
the individual's conscious life, the blacker and denser
it is. At all counts, it forms an unconscious snag,
thwarting our most well-meant intentions.''
(Carl Jung)

Okay, if Jung is right, what can be done about
 the shadow(bogeyman within)?
A few suggestions:
Identify your shadow and what triggers it.
When it is triggered, what are your feelings?
Investigate those feelings compassionately.
Try not to confront the shadow, rather, try to
understand it.

''Name the fears that are holding you back.
It's the equivalent of flooding the bogeyman
with light.''
(Gina Greenlee)

about the image: graphite on paper, border made in pxlr

Sunday, 10 November 2019

Things are not always what they seem..................


The black cab glides through the deserted city streets.
Reflections from the traffic lights intermittently cover the
rain soaked streets with a multitude of colours.
In the backseat of the cab, a silent, serious looking young man.
Every now and then the cab driver casts a furtive glance
in the rear-view mirror to check on his passenger.
He decides to try and strike up a conversation.
''Aren't you a bit young to be travelling all alone at 
this time of the night?''.
No answer.
''If I was out and about at this time of the night at your age, 
my folks would've had my hide'' the cab driver tries again.
Still no answer.
The cab driver decides to put on the radio.
''Do you like music? I like the swing bands, they really get
me going, you know, The Duke, Goodman, Basie and those cats.''
''Oh, good, the lights turned red, now I can find a good station.''
The cab stops at the lights and the cab driver fiddles with
the knobs on the radio until Benny Goodman's ''Sing, Sing, Sing''
fills the silence.
Still nothing from the passenger in the backseat.
''I tell ya, Goodman really knows how to play that clarinet, don't you think?''
The cab driver throws another glance in the rear-view mirror.
''Sheesh, that's one strange youngster, so damned serious,''
 he mutters under his breath.
Before he had left home for his night-shift, his wife had told him
to not talk too much to his passengers, but, he likes
talking to people, it makes the time pass quicker.
He throws a glance at the meter; 20 dollars.
''You sure you've got the money to pay for this ride? he asks 
his young passenger.
His eyes meets his passenger's eyes in the rear-view mirror.
''Yikes, okay, okay, I get it, you've got the money.''
''Hey, no offense, just making sure, is all."
Lorna is right, I should just zip it, he thinks to himself.
We are almost there now anyway.
Fillmore 2547, East Upper side. Two blocks away.
A few minutes later he pulls up at the Fillmore.
He turns off the meter, turns to face his passenger and then says:
 ''That will be $27.50.''
The passenger hands him a fifty dollar bill, waves his hand as
to indicate that he doesn't want the change, then exits the cab.
As the cab driver slips the bill into his wallet, he throws a quick glance
through the side window of the cab and sees the young
man holding something shiny in his right hand.
Only after the doors to the Fillmore Hotel has closed behind 
the young man, does he realize what the shiny thing is.
    A gun.


about the image: graphite on cardboard with a filter added

Sunday, 3 November 2019

Finding beauty.........


Beauty.
What is beauty to you?
A glistening blue ocean, a magical sunset, a pristine forest,
a star lit evening sky, a special piece of music, a ballerina
doing the pas de deau, your child's smile, an elegant equation,
etc.etc.
When we experience something we deem beauty, something
seems to happen to us.
And often, though not always, that ''something'' is an
instinctual emotional response.
Tears may well up in our eyes, our hearts may beat a little
faster, a sense of lightness may flow through our bodies,
we may suddenly feel like dancing, singing, crying, laughing,
etc.etc.
Beauty, it seems, has an ability to bypass our cognition
and lodge itself somewhere inside of us out
of reach from our consciousness.
''His/her/its beauty made me catch my breath, the beauty with which
 they danced across the stage left me breathless,
the beauty of the way the eagle soared across the midnight sky brought
tears to my eyes, the beauty of the opening chord to Tristan and Isolde
pierced my soul, etc.etc.'' 
(just some examples, there are more of course)
Is the ability to appreciate beauty(whatever we may deem to be beauty)
 something we are all born with, or is it something we learn to do?
If we are all born with the ability to appreciate beauty, can that
ability be squashed if it isn't encouraged?
Children, it seems to me, often have their own take on what constitutes ''beauty''.
For a child, a worm, a ferret, a snake, a caterpillar, a ladybug, 
a blowfly, a dandelion, a muddy puddle, a dog with three legs,
etc.etc. can all be things of beauty.
''Mommy, look at me, I look beautiful!'' says the little girl
dressed in black and white spotted gum boots, a purple tutu,
red and white striped tights, a pink and silver coloured
t-shirt, and ruby red lipstick smeared all over her face.
''Daddy, look what I found! I found this beautiful lizard in the garden,
isn't he beautiful, Daddy?'' says the little boy as he holds
up a water dragon for his father to see.
Though I don't know this for sure and have not been able to find
any information to substantiate the validity of this thought, I think that
a child far easier finds beauty in the world around them
then us adults. I have a sneaky feeling that as the years pass, we
become less able(or perhaps willing) to spot beauty in the midst
of our day to day lives.
(Not to mention that these days, the ''ugly'' things us humans 
do to each other and our planet is plastered before our
eyes 24/7 on some screen somewhere.)
The good news is that with very little effort
 we can once again find beauty.
All it takes is for us to take the time to 
look for it without prejudice.
For me, really understanding the words: ''wherever you are, be there''
has helped me to keep a look out for ''beauty'' even in the most
dire of situations.
 Perhaps those words may come in handy for you as well?
I hope so.
Life is full of beauty. Take the time to notice it.

about the painting: It's called ''Glimpses of Beauty''...acrylic on canvas

Sunday, 27 October 2019

''Nothing worthwhile was ever achieved without an element of risk."....on opportunity


''Nothing worthwhile was ever achieved without
an element of risk."
Who first said this, or where the quote comes from, I have
no idea. However, regardless of not knowing the origin of the quote,
in my view it has merit.
In order to discover anything new to us, at some point, we often have to
un-zip our established and comfortable mindsets. 
(According to those in the know, consciously we can only
pay attention to one thought at the time, so the only way to
have a new thought is to let go of the old one.)
As a kid, I couldn't stomach celery. The taste of it made me feel
nauseous so I decided that I had to avoid celery for the rest
of my life. So I did, until...someone handed me a celery stick
covered in peanut butter. I love peanut butter, so I decided
to try it. I loved it, not only the peanut butter, but the combination
of the celery and peanut butter. I now love crispy celery on its
own, in salads, and smothered in peanut butter.
I had been given an opportunity to challenge my mindset
concerning celery. There was a risk that I was going to
feel nauseous, but there was also the possibility
that I was going to experience something worthwhile (and tasty).
Being able to quickly to do some form of ''risk assessment'', is
in my view a handy, and from a survival point of view, 
a very useful attribute.
''If I do this (whatever this may be) what is the risk that
it may have ''bad/dire'' consequences?"
Once we have established what we view the consequences to be,
often we then decide whether we are willing to ''risk it'' or not.
But here is the thing as I see it; it can be easy to pay so much
attention to the ''risky bits'' that we forget to consider possible
opportunities that may be available to us as well.
Trying something new always carries with it the possibility/risk of
''failing, making a fool of ourselves, falling flat on our face, being 
laughed at, seem stupid, etc.etc.''
This is true, this may happen, but it may not. 
People we now call friends were once strangers, 
skills we now have, were acquired on the back of ''mistakes'',
''exotic'' foods we now love (sushi, pizza, Asian food, Mexican, etc.etc)
we learnt to love by taking the risk of trying some.
Countries we now love to visit, we have learned to love by taking
the risk of leaving our home countries with all their comforts and
familiarities.
Opportunities, even when there may be some risk involved, become
visible to us when we ask: ''Yes, there is some risk involved, but what
if there are some amazing opportunities as well?
Taking a ''risk'' and taking a ''calculated risk'', may I suggest
are two different things.
If we do a ''risk assessment'' before we go ahead and do
something, in my view, that would constitute taking a calculated risk.
Running a red traffic light, that in my view is plain risky. (There are too 
many variables at stop lights to be able to do a ''true'' risk assessment.
I guess perhaps one could say that the opposite of a ''calculated risk'',
is ''gambling''.)
Risk averse, though many of us may be and perhaps rightly so,
I still believe it may be useful for us to consider:
''Nothing worthwhile was ever achieved without
an element of risk.''

''The pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity.
The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.''
(Winston Churchill)

''You can measure opportunity with the same 
yardstick that measures the risk involved.
They go together.''
(Earl Nightingale)

''Life may be risky business,
but that doesn't mean we shouldn't live it.''
(Citizen Z)

about the painting: acrylic on canvas
The face peeking through the zip is Andy Warhol